The Law of Indi¤erence, Equilibrium, and Equilibration in Jevons, Walras, Edgeworth, and Negishi
نویسنده
چکیده
In the glorious decade running from 1871 to 1881, Jevons, Walras, and Edgeworth laid the foundations of most modern microeconomic analysis: in his Theory of Political Economy (1 edition 1871, 2 edition 1879; henceforth TPE ), not only did Jevons formalise for the rst time, by means of his celebrated "equations of exchange", the conditions de ning the equilibrium of a pure-exchange two-commodity, two-trader economy, but he also opened up a line of thought that would lead, about one century later, to the emergence of a theory of decentralised exchange based on pairwise interactions (see, e.g., Kunimoto and Serrano, 2004); in a series of mémoires published in the mid1870s (1874, 1876a, 1876b, 1877a), as well as in the 1 edition of his Eléments déconomie politique pure (henceforth EEPP), appearing in two instalments in the same stretch of time (1874-77), Walras started o¤ a grand theoretical approach, subsequently named general equilibrium theory, applying not only to exchange economies with an arbitrary number of markets and agents, but also to multi-market and multi-agent economies with production and capital formation; nally, in his Mathematical Psychics (1881; henceforth MP), Edgeworth sealed the revolutionary decade 1871-1881 by initiating a tradition that would lead, about eighty years later, to the development of a theory of decentralised exchange based on multilateral interactions, a special branch of the broader approach known as coalitional game theory. All the three founding fathers made use of at least one equilibrium concept in their respective theoretical systems, occasionally naming it "competitive
منابع مشابه
Methodological Shortcomings in Classical Mathematical Economics: A Critical Examination of the Contributions of Cournot, Jevons and Walras
This paper examines critically the contributions of Cournot, Jevons and Walras as the founders of classical mathematical economics from a methodological standpoint. Advances in different economic schools and doctrines in the 19th century produced an environment of multi-dimensionality in economic analysis which was regarded by the pioneers of classical mathematical economists as a chaotic state...
متن کاملA Critical Analysis of the Origin and Nature of Classical Mathematical Economics: Why Classical Economists Did Not Use Mathematics?
The role of mathematics in economic analysis is not yet a settled question. Smith, Ricardo, Mill and other eminent classical economists did not use mathematics in their economic theorizations. We have defined classical mathematical economics as the whole body of literature in mathematical treatment of economics originating mainly from the contributions of Cournot, Jevons and Walras. There are ...
متن کاملHicks on Walrasian Equilibrium in the 1930s and Beyond
In 1973 Economica devoted its February issue to celebrating Sir John Hicks. On that occasion, Hicks’s famous monograph Value and Capital (1939) was hailed as “the book that transformed economic theory” (p. 1). Nowadays Value and Capital (henceforth VC) is viewed as the starting point of the so-called neo-Walrasian research programme. From at least the 1970s Hicks himself endorsed that qualifica...
متن کاملEdgeworth and Walras equilibria of an arbitrage-free exchange economy
In this paper, we first give a direct proof of the existence of Edgeworth equilibria for exchange economies with (possibly) unbounded below consumption sets. The key assumption is that the individually rational utility set is compact. It is worth noticing that the statement of this result and its proof do not depend on the dimension or the particular structure of the commodity space. In a secon...
متن کاملMarshall vs. Walras on Equilibrium and Disequilibrium
In this paper I critically analyse the view that John Hicks sought to establish, according to which Walras’ and Marshall’s approaches to price theory, while differing in scope (that is, general vs. partial analysis), are basically similar in their aims, presuppositions and results. By focusing on a special kind of economy (the pure-exchange, two-commodity economy), which has been formally studi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011